ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Raw materials
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 29.3%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 270 239 70 29.3% 169 31
Arizona 12 12 5 41.7% 7 -
Arkansas 2 2 - - 2 -
California 31 27 7 25.9% 20 4
Colorado 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Connecticut 5 4 - - 4 1
Delaware 1 1 - - 1 -
Florida 6 4 1 25.0% 3 2
Georgia 9 9 2 22.2% 7 -
Idaho 5 1 - - 1 4
Illinois 11 10 7 70.0% 3 1
Indiana 1 1 - - 1 -
Iowa 7 6 2 33.3% 4 1
Kansas 2 1 - - 1 1
Kentucky 6 6 - - 6 -
Maine 7 6 5 83.3% 1 1
Massachusetts 8 8 2 25.0% 6 -
Michigan 5 5 - - 5 -
Minnesota 20 20 3 15.0% 17 -
Mississippi 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Missouri 8 6 3 50.0% 3 2
Nebraska 3 - - - - 3
Nevada 4 4 - - 4 -
New Hampshire 2 2 - - 2 -
New Jersey 3 3 - - 3 -
New York 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
North Carolina 20 18 4 22.2% 14 2
Ohio 7 6 4 66.7% 2 1
Oklahoma 9 8 1 12.5% 7 1
Oregon 7 5 2 40.0% 3 2
Pennsylvania 8 8 2 25.0% 6 -
South Carolina 3 3 - - 3 -
South Dakota 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Tennessee 11 8 1 12.5% 7 3
Texas 12 12 3 25.0% 9 -
Utah 5 4 4 100.0% - 1
Vermont 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Virginia 9 9 3 33.3% 6 -
Washington 3 2 - - 2 1
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -