ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Material reduction
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 38.1%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 252 226 86 38.1% 140 26
Alabama 1 1 - - 1 -
Arizona 10 8 3 37.5% 5 2
Arkansas 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
California 25 24 10 41.7% 14 1
Colorado 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Florida 9 9 5 55.6% 4 -
Georgia 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Idaho 3 3 - - 3 -
Illinois 12 12 5 41.7% 7 -
Indiana 3 3 - - 3 -
Iowa 10 8 3 37.5% 5 2
Kansas 10 8 5 62.5% 3 2
Kentucky 1 1 - - 1 -
Louisiana 4 3 1 33.3% 2 1
Maine 3 1 - - 1 2
Massachusetts 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Michigan 4 3 2 66.7% 1 1
Minnesota 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Mississippi 1 1 - - 1 -
Missouri 10 10 1 10.0% 9 -
Nebraska 3 2 2 100.0% - 1
Nevada 3 2 - - 2 1
New Hampshire 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Jersey 1 1 - - 1 -
New York 2 2 - - 2 -
North Carolina 8 6 4 66.7% 2 2
Ohio 13 12 2 16.7% 10 1
Oklahoma 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Oregon 27 24 9 37.5% 15 3
Pennsylvania 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
South Carolina 1 1 - - 1 -
South Dakota 1 1 - - 1 -
Tennessee 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Texas 26 23 12 52.2% 11 3
Utah 2 2 - - 2 -
Vermont 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Virginia 5 5 - - 5 -
Washington 8 7 3 42.9% 4 1
West Virginia 2 2 - - 2 -
Wisconsin 4 2 - - 2 2
Wyoming 1 - - - - 1