ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Recover and reuse cooling water
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 42.5%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 303 299 127 42.5% 172 4
Arizona 4 4 - - 4 -
Arkansas 13 13 6 46.2% 7 -
California 14 14 7 50.0% 7 -
Colorado 7 7 5 71.4% 2 -
Connecticut 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Delaware 3 2 - - 2 1
Florida 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Georgia 7 7 5 71.4% 2 -
Illinois 29 29 11 37.9% 18 -
Indiana 8 8 2 25.0% 6 -
Iowa 10 10 7 70.0% 3 -
Kansas 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Kentucky 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Louisiana 1 1 - - 1 -
Maine 11 11 3 27.3% 8 -
Maryland 5 5 - - 5 -
Massachusetts 9 9 3 33.3% 6 -
Michigan 15 15 5 33.3% 10 -
Minnesota 5 5 3 60.0% 2 -
Mississippi 1 1 - - 1 -
Missouri 28 28 12 42.9% 16 -
Nebraska 10 10 6 60.0% 4 -
New Hampshire 2 2 - - 2 -
New Jersey 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
New Mexico 2 2 - - 2 -
New York 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1
North Carolina 22 22 7 31.8% 15 -
Ohio 24 24 11 45.8% 13 -
Oklahoma 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Oregon 13 13 9 69.2% 4 -
Pennsylvania 5 5 - - 5 -
South Carolina 2 2 - - 2 -
Tennessee 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Texas 13 12 7 58.3% 5 1
Utah 3 3 - - 3 -
Vermont 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Virginia 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Washington 4 4 4 100.0% - -
Wisconsin 3 2 - - 2 1