ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Miscellaneous
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 37.1%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 270 232 86 37.1% 146 38
Alabama 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Arizona 3 2 - - 2 1
Arkansas 2 2 - - 2 -
California 32 32 16 50.0% 16 -
Colorado 4 3 3 100.0% - 1
Connecticut 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Delaware 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Florida 8 5 1 20.0% 4 3
Georgia 15 12 6 50.0% 6 3
Idaho 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Illinois 11 10 6 60.0% 4 1
Indiana 6 5 3 60.0% 2 1
Iowa 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Kansas 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Kentucky 17 4 1 25.0% 3 13
Louisiana 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Maine 1 1 - - 1 -
Maryland 1 - - - - 1
Massachusetts 9 9 3 33.3% 6 -
Michigan 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Minnesota 6 4 2 50.0% 2 2
Mississippi 2 2 - - 2 -
Missouri 6 5 - - 5 1
Nebraska 2 2 2 100.0% - -
New Hampshire 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Jersey 4 4 - - 4 -
New Mexico 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New York 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
North Carolina 9 7 1 14.3% 6 2
Ohio 27 22 6 27.3% 16 5
Oklahoma 16 16 4 25.0% 12 -
Oregon 7 6 4 66.7% 2 1
Pennsylvania 7 7 1 14.3% 6 -
Rhode Island 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Tennessee 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Texas 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Utah 6 4 1 25.0% 3 2
Vermont 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Virginia 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Washington 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
West Virginia 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Wisconsin 3 2 - - 2 1