ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Blowdown
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 36.7%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 325 300 110 36.7% 190 25
Alabama 3 3 - - 3 -
Arizona 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Arkansas 7 7 1 14.3% 6 -
California 50 46 23 50.0% 23 4
Colorado 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Connecticut 1 1 - - 1 -
Delaware 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Florida 10 10 3 30.0% 7 -
Georgia 30 28 5 17.9% 23 2
Hawaii 3 1 1 100.0% - 2
Idaho 1 - - - - 1
Illinois 9 9 6 66.7% 3 -
Indiana 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Iowa 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Kansas 14 14 5 35.7% 9 -
Louisiana 8 8 2 25.0% 6 -
Maine 2 2 - - 2 -
Massachusetts 2 2 - - 2 -
Michigan 9 8 2 25.0% 6 1
Minnesota 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Mississippi 4 3 2 66.7% 1 1
Missouri 5 5 3 60.0% 2 -
Nebraska 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Nevada 2 - - - - 2
New Hampshire 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Jersey 2 1 1 100.0% - 1
New York 1 1 1 100.0% - -
North Carolina 29 28 14 50.0% 14 1
Ohio 22 19 5 26.3% 14 3
Oklahoma 14 14 4 28.6% 10 -
Oregon 7 6 1 16.7% 5 1
Pennsylvania 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Puerto Rico 4 3 1 33.3% 2 1
South Carolina 9 8 3 37.5% 5 1
Tennessee 9 8 3 37.5% 5 1
Texas 8 7 1 14.3% 6 1
Utah 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Virginia 7 6 1 16.7% 5 1
Washington 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -