ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Combine utility meters
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 29.9%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 321 288 86 29.9% 202 33
Alabama 10 10 3 30.0% 7 -
Arizona 11 9 4 44.4% 5 2
Arkansas 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
California 16 13 2 15.4% 11 3
Colorado 1 1 - - 1 -
Connecticut 4 3 2 66.7% 1 1
Florida 7 6 3 50.0% 3 1
Georgia 55 48 11 22.9% 37 7
Idaho 3 3 - - 3 -
Illinois 5 4 - - 4 1
Indiana 16 15 2 13.3% 13 1
Iowa 2 2 - - 2 -
Kansas 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kentucky 3 1 1 100.0% - 2
Louisiana 14 14 5 35.7% 9 -
Maine 1 1 - - 1 -
Massachusetts 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Michigan 7 5 1 20.0% 4 2
Mississippi 11 10 2 20.0% 8 1
Missouri 4 4 - - 4 -
Nebraska 2 1 1 100.0% - 1
Nevada 2 2 - - 2 -
New Hampshire 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
New Jersey 1 1 - - 1 -
New York 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
North Carolina 2 2 - - 2 -
Ohio 38 36 11 30.6% 25 2
Oklahoma 8 6 4 66.7% 2 2
Oregon 12 12 5 41.7% 7 -
Pennsylvania 4 2 - - 2 2
Puerto Rico 1 1 - - 1 -
South Carolina 5 3 - - 3 2
South Dakota 1 1 - - 1 -
Tennessee 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Texas 29 27 14 51.9% 13 2
Utah 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Virginia 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Washington 2 2 - - 2 -
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 13 13 3 23.1% 10 -