ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Burn a less expensive grade of fuel
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 34.2%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 158 146 50 34.2% 96 12
Alabama 6 6 - - 6 -
Arizona 1 1 - - 1 -
California 3 3 - - 3 -
Colorado 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Connecticut 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Delaware 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Florida 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Georgia 10 10 3 30.0% 7 -
Hawaii 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Idaho 2 1 - - 1 1
Illinois 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Indiana 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Iowa 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kansas 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kentucky 6 4 2 50.0% 2 2
Louisiana 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Maine 4 3 - - 3 1
Maryland 2 2 - - 2 -
Massachusetts 17 17 6 35.3% 11 -
Michigan 2 2 - - 2 -
Minnesota 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Mississippi 5 3 - - 3 2
Missouri 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Nevada 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Hampshire 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Jersey 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New York 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
North Carolina 13 13 5 38.5% 8 -
Ohio 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Oklahoma 5 2 - - 2 3
Oregon 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Pennsylvania 11 9 - - 9 2
Rhode Island 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
South Carolina 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Tennessee 1 1 - - 1 -
Texas 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Utah 1 - - - - 1
Vermont 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Virginia 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Washington 2 2 - - 2 -
West Virginia 10 10 - - 10 -
Wyoming 1 1 1 100.0% - -