ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Use heat from boiler blowdown to preheat boiler feed water
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 31.6%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 204 190 60 31.6% 130 14
Alabama 1 1 - - 1 -
Arizona 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Arkansas 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
California 34 30 11 36.7% 19 4
Colorado 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Delaware 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Florida 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Georgia 23 22 3 13.6% 19 1
Idaho 1 - - - - 1
Illinois 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Indiana 1 1 - - 1 -
Iowa 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Kansas 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Louisiana 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Maine 2 2 - - 2 -
Massachusetts 2 2 - - 2 -
Michigan 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1
Minnesota 5 4 3 75.0% 1 1
Mississippi 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Missouri 2 2 - - 2 -
Nebraska 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Hampshire 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Jersey 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New York 1 1 1 100.0% - -
North Carolina 15 14 5 35.7% 9 1
Ohio 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Oklahoma 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Oregon 7 6 1 16.7% 5 1
Pennsylvania 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Puerto Rico 3 2 - - 2 1
South Carolina 5 4 3 75.0% 1 1
Tennessee 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Texas 4 4 - - 4 -
Utah 4 3 - - 3 1
Virginia 4 4 - - 4 -
Washington 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -