ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Begin a practice of predictive / preventative maintenance
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 56.7%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 475 439 249 56.7% 190 36
Alabama 1 - - - - 1
Arizona 21 12 7 58.3% 5 9
Arkansas 28 28 10 35.7% 18 -
California 21 21 15 71.4% 6 -
Connecticut 8 7 3 42.9% 4 1
Florida 15 15 10 66.7% 5 -
Georgia 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Hawaii 1 1 - - 1 -
Illinois 9 9 6 66.7% 3 -
Indiana 13 12 6 50.0% 6 1
Iowa 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kansas 8 8 4 50.0% 4 -
Kentucky 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Louisiana 130 126 79 62.7% 47 4
Massachusetts 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Michigan 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Minnesota 13 13 6 46.2% 7 -
Mississippi 6 4 1 25.0% 3 2
Missouri 44 43 30 69.8% 13 1
Nebraska 1 1 - - 1 -
Nevada 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
New Jersey 7 5 4 80.0% 1 2
New Mexico 1 1 - - 1 -
New York 11 11 7 63.6% 4 -
North Carolina 10 9 6 66.7% 3 1
Ohio 8 7 3 42.9% 4 1
Oklahoma 32 27 10 37.0% 17 5
Oregon 9 7 5 71.4% 2 2
Pennsylvania 14 14 6 42.9% 8 -
South Carolina 2 2 2 100.0% - -
South Dakota 2 1 - - 1 1
Tennessee 12 10 6 60.0% 4 2
Texas 17 17 11 64.7% 6 -
Utah 1 - - - - 1
Virginia 2 1 1 100.0% - 1
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 2 1 - - 1 1