ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Floor layout
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 44.0%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 526 480 211 44.0% 269 46
Alabama 1 1 - - 1 -
Alaska 1 - - - - 1
Arizona 30 24 7 29.2% 17 6
Arkansas 38 35 14 40.0% 21 3
California 43 42 15 35.7% 27 1
Colorado 10 10 4 40.0% 6 -
Connecticut 1 - - - - 1
Florida 31 26 11 42.3% 15 5
Georgia 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Idaho 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Illinois 28 25 17 68.0% 8 3
Indiana 7 6 - - 6 1
Iowa 8 7 3 42.9% 4 1
Kansas 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Kentucky 9 8 2 25.0% 6 1
Louisiana 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Maine 8 5 1 20.0% 4 3
Maryland 1 1 - - 1 -
Michigan 16 16 6 37.5% 10 -
Minnesota 13 13 9 69.2% 4 -
Mississippi 17 16 7 43.8% 9 1
Missouri 53 50 29 58.0% 21 3
Nebraska 4 3 3 100.0% - 1
Nevada 7 5 5 100.0% - 2
New Jersey 8 7 3 42.9% 4 1
New Mexico 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New York 22 22 9 40.9% 13 -
North Carolina 18 17 7 41.2% 10 1
Ohio 32 32 12 37.5% 20 -
Oklahoma 17 16 9 56.3% 7 1
Oregon 13 13 5 38.5% 8 -
Pennsylvania 25 25 10 40.0% 15 -
South Dakota 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Tennessee 2 2 - - 2 -
Texas 14 10 1 10.0% 9 4
Utah 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Vermont 1 1 - - 1 -
Virginia 9 7 2 28.6% 5 2
Washington 6 5 5 100.0% - 1
West Virginia 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Wisconsin 7 5 2 40.0% 3 2