ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Solvents
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 29.6%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 411 398 118 29.6% 280 13
Alabama 2 2 - - 2 -
Arkansas 12 12 4 33.3% 8 -
California 30 29 17 58.6% 12 1
Colorado 68 67 15 22.4% 52 1
Connecticut 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Florida 18 18 6 33.3% 12 -
Georgia 9 7 2 28.6% 5 2
Illinois 26 26 4 15.4% 22 -
Indiana 9 8 4 50.0% 4 1
Iowa 12 12 5 41.7% 7 -
Kansas 15 15 5 33.3% 10 -
Kentucky 9 9 1 11.1% 8 -
Louisiana 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Maine 1 1 - - 1 -
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Michigan 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Minnesota 12 12 3 25.0% 9 -
Mississippi 11 11 1 9.1% 10 -
Missouri 19 19 10 52.6% 9 -
Nebraska 12 12 5 41.7% 7 -
Nevada 1 1 - - 1 -
New Hampshire 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Mexico 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
New York 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
North Carolina 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Ohio 17 17 6 35.3% 11 -
Oklahoma 10 10 2 20.0% 8 -
Oregon 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Pennsylvania 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
South Carolina 1 1 - - 1 -
South Dakota 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Tennessee 10 9 3 33.3% 6 1
Texas 30 29 6 20.7% 23 1
Utah 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Virginia 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Washington 3 2 - - 2 1
Wisconsin 28 24 2 8.3% 22 4
Wyoming 3 3 - - 3 -