ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Use a less expensive method of waste removal
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 40.5%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 424 393 159 40.5% 234 31
Alabama 3 3 - - 3 -
Arizona 99 91 35 38.5% 56 8
Arkansas 3 3 - - 3 -
California 31 31 17 54.8% 14 -
Colorado 44 38 15 39.5% 23 6
Connecticut 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Florida 24 24 8 33.3% 16 -
Georgia 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Idaho 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Illinois 20 16 7 43.8% 9 4
Indiana 6 6 - - 6 -
Iowa 2 2 - - 2 -
Kansas 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kentucky 12 12 1 8.3% 11 -
Maine 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Massachusetts 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Michigan 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Minnesota 3 3 - - 3 -
Mississippi 3 2 - - 2 1
Missouri 5 4 - - 4 1
Nebraska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Nevada 8 7 3 42.9% 4 1
New Hampshire 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Jersey 2 2 - - 2 -
New Mexico 2 2 - - 2 -
New York 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
North Carolina 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Ohio 10 10 3 30.0% 7 -
Oklahoma 6 6 3 50.0% 3 -
Oregon 13 12 6 50.0% 6 1
Pennsylvania 3 3 - - 3 -
South Carolina 7 5 2 40.0% 3 2
Tennessee 9 8 4 50.0% 4 1
Texas 37 35 22 62.9% 13 2
Utah 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Virginia 16 15 7 46.7% 8 1
Washington 1 1 1 100.0% - -
West Virginia 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Wisconsin 14 12 8 66.7% 4 2
Wyoming 3 3 - - 3 -