ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Liquid waste
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 34.7%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 253 236 82 34.7% 154 17
Alabama 2 2 - - 2 -
Arizona 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Arkansas 5 5 - - 5 -
California 15 15 5 33.3% 10 -
Colorado 9 9 2 22.2% 7 -
Connecticut 1 1 - - 1 -
Florida 3 2 - - 2 1
Georgia 18 15 6 40.0% 9 3
Idaho 1 - - - - 1
Illinois 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Indiana 10 10 5 50.0% 5 -
Iowa 1 1 - - 1 -
Kansas 3 3 3 100.0% - -
Kentucky 14 12 3 25.0% 9 2
Louisiana 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Maine 9 7 4 57.1% 3 2
Massachusetts 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Michigan 13 12 4 33.3% 8 1
Minnesota 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Mississippi 2 2 - - 2 -
Missouri 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Montana 1 - - - - 1
Nebraska 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Nevada 2 1 1 100.0% - 1
New Hampshire 1 1 - - 1 -
New York 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
North Carolina 12 10 3 30.0% 7 2
Ohio 32 32 7 21.9% 25 -
Oklahoma 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Oregon 6 5 1 20.0% 4 1
Pennsylvania 9 9 2 22.2% 7 -
South Carolina 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Tennessee 7 5 2 40.0% 3 2
Texas 12 12 8 66.7% 4 -
Utah 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Virginia 2 2 - - 2 -
Washington 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
West Virginia 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Wisconsin 1 1 - - 1 -