ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Miscellaneous
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 33.6%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 281 265 89 33.6% 176 16
Arizona 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Arkansas 3 3 - - 3 -
California 16 15 7 46.7% 8 1
Colorado 5 4 2 50.0% 2 1
Connecticut 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Delaware 2 2 - - 2 -
Florida 12 10 1 10.0% 9 2
Georgia 65 64 21 32.8% 43 1
Idaho 5 3 2 66.7% 1 2
Illinois 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Indiana 2 2 - - 2 -
Kansas 9 9 2 22.2% 7 -
Kentucky 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Louisiana 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Maine 3 3 - - 3 -
Maryland 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Massachusetts 2 2 - - 2 -
Michigan 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Mississippi 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Missouri 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Nebraska 2 2 - - 2 -
Nevada 1 1 - - 1 -
New Hampshire 3 3 - - 3 -
New Jersey 2 2 - - 2 -
New York 4 4 4 100.0% - -
North Carolina 20 18 7 38.9% 11 2
Ohio 28 26 12 46.2% 14 2
Oklahoma 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Oregon 9 9 3 33.3% 6 -
Pennsylvania 12 11 2 18.2% 9 1
South Carolina 4 3 1 33.3% 2 1
Tennessee 10 10 3 30.0% 7 -
Texas 7 6 2 33.3% 4 1
Utah 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Virginia 6 6 - - 6 -
Washington 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
West Virginia 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Wisconsin 2 2 - - 2 -
Wyoming 1 1 - - 1 -