ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Use power during off-peak periods
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 40.2%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 188 179 72 40.2% 107 9
Alabama 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Arizona 3 3 3 100.0% - -
Arkansas 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
California 24 23 12 52.2% 11 1
Colorado 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Connecticut 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Florida 9 9 1 11.1% 8 -
Georgia 9 9 3 33.3% 6 -
Illinois 26 23 7 30.4% 16 3
Indiana 2 2 - - 2 -
Iowa 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Kansas 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kentucky 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Louisiana 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Maine 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 1 1 - - 1 -
Michigan 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Minnesota 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Mississippi 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Nebraska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Nevada 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Hampshire 1 1 - - 1 -
New Mexico 2 1 - - 1 1
New York 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
North Carolina 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Ohio 21 20 8 40.0% 12 1
Oklahoma 10 10 1 10.0% 9 -
Oregon 2 2 - - 2 -
Pennsylvania 2 1 1 100.0% - 1
South Carolina 1 1 - - 1 -
South Dakota 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Tennessee 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Texas 11 10 5 50.0% 5 1
Utah 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Washington 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 7 7 1 14.3% 6 -