ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Replace existing chiller with high efficiency model
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 40.6%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 279 239 97 40.6% 142 40
Alaska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Arizona 29 29 9 31.0% 20 -
Arkansas 3 3 3 100.0% - -
California 17 15 6 40.0% 9 2
Colorado 9 6 3 50.0% 3 3
Connecticut 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Delaware 4 2 2 100.0% - 2
Florida 29 25 12 48.0% 13 4
Georgia 14 11 3 27.3% 8 3
Hawaii 1 1 - - 1 -
Illinois 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Indiana 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Iowa 6 1 1 100.0% - 5
Kansas 5 4 2 50.0% 2 1
Louisiana 8 4 1 25.0% 3 4
Maine 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Maryland 1 1 - - 1 -
Massachusetts 12 11 5 45.5% 6 1
Michigan 3 2 2 100.0% - 1
Mississippi 2 2 - - 2 -
Missouri 13 13 5 38.5% 8 -
Nebraska 1 - - - - 1
New Jersey 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
New York 3 1 1 100.0% - 2
North Carolina 2 2 - - 2 -
Ohio 9 9 5 55.6% 4 -
Oklahoma 9 8 3 37.5% 5 1
Oregon 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Pennsylvania 18 16 6 37.5% 10 2
Puerto Rico 6 3 3 100.0% - 3
South Carolina 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Tennessee 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Texas 10 8 3 37.5% 5 2
Utah 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Virginia 4 3 1 33.3% 2 1
Washington 9 7 2 28.6% 5 2
West Virginia 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Wisconsin 8 8 1 12.5% 7 -