ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Heating
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 48.8%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 327 291 142 48.8% 149 36
Alabama 5 5 3 60.0% 2 -
Alaska 1 - - - - 1
Arizona 1 1 - - 1 -
Arkansas 4 4 4 100.0% - -
California 9 8 5 62.5% 3 1
Colorado 10 9 5 55.6% 4 1
Connecticut 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Delaware 7 4 2 50.0% 2 3
Florida 11 9 3 33.3% 6 2
Georgia 33 31 12 38.7% 19 2
Illinois 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Indiana 26 20 10 50.0% 10 6
Iowa 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Kansas 13 11 4 36.4% 7 2
Kentucky 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Louisiana 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Maine 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 17 17 6 35.3% 11 -
Michigan 22 16 9 56.3% 7 6
Mississippi 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Missouri 10 10 7 70.0% 3 -
Nebraska 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Nevada 1 1 - - 1 -
New Hampshire 5 5 4 80.0% 1 -
New Jersey 10 9 5 55.6% 4 1
North Carolina 7 6 3 50.0% 3 1
Ohio 37 33 16 48.5% 17 4
Oklahoma 8 8 5 62.5% 3 -
Oregon 14 13 7 53.8% 6 1
Pennsylvania 7 5 2 40.0% 3 2
Rhode Island 2 2 - - 2 -
South Carolina 2 1 - - 1 1
Tennessee 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1
Texas 10 9 5 55.6% 4 1
Utah 8 8 5 62.5% 3 -
Vermont 1 1 - - 1 -
Virginia 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Washington 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
West Virginia 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Wisconsin 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -