ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC Plastics foam products
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 50.6%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 992 865 438 50.6% 427 127
Arizona 13 13 5 38.5% 8 -
Arkansas 32 22 13 59.1% 9 10
California 113 97 47 48.5% 50 16
Colorado 13 4 - - 4 9
Connecticut 19 9 3 33.3% 6 10
Delaware 31 24 10 41.7% 14 7
Florida 71 71 45 63.4% 26 -
Georgia 32 32 10 31.3% 22 -
Illinois 35 35 18 51.4% 17 -
Indiana 16 16 5 31.3% 11 -
Iowa 23 15 8 53.3% 7 8
Kansas 16 16 6 37.5% 10 -
Louisiana 8 8 4 50.0% 4 -
Maine 8 8 5 62.5% 3 -
Maryland 10 10 - - 10 -
Massachusetts 19 19 3 15.8% 16 -
Michigan 34 34 7 20.6% 27 -
Mississippi 44 38 19 50.0% 19 6
Missouri 32 32 14 43.8% 18 -
Nebraska 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Nevada 21 21 9 42.9% 12 -
New Jersey 11 11 5 45.5% 6 -
New York 36 24 17 70.8% 7 12
North Carolina 45 25 11 44.0% 14 20
Ohio 31 31 20 64.5% 11 -
Oklahoma 11 11 6 54.5% 5 -
Oregon 13 13 6 46.2% 7 -
Pennsylvania 47 32 16 50.0% 16 15
South Carolina 11 11 7 63.6% 4 -
South Dakota 6 - - - - 6
Tennessee 26 26 17 65.4% 9 -
Texas 68 68 56 82.4% 12 -
Utah 15 7 3 42.9% 4 8
Virginia 11 11 7 63.6% 4 -
Washington 28 28 18 64.3% 10 -
West Virginia 8 8 6 75.0% 2 -
Wisconsin 28 28 9 32.1% 19 -