ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Install automatic packing equipment
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 29.0%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 308 293 85 29.0% 208 15
Alabama 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Alaska 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Arizona 9 9 2 22.2% 7 -
Arkansas 13 13 2 15.4% 11 -
California 41 39 17 43.6% 22 2
Colorado 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Connecticut 1 1 - - 1 -
Florida 15 15 2 13.3% 13 -
Georgia 7 6 - - 6 1
Idaho 2 1 - - 1 1
Illinois 42 42 14 33.3% 28 -
Indiana 2 2 - - 2 -
Iowa 21 20 4 20.0% 16 1
Kansas 3 3 - - 3 -
Kentucky 1 1 - - 1 -
Louisiana 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Maine 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Michigan 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Minnesota 15 15 3 20.0% 12 -
Mississippi 5 4 3 75.0% 1 1
Missouri 6 5 2 40.0% 3 1
Nebraska 8 7 2 28.6% 5 1
Nevada 7 5 1 20.0% 4 2
New Hampshire 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Jersey 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
New York 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
North Carolina 1 1 1 100.0% - -
North Dakota 1 1 - - 1 -
Ohio 7 7 1 14.3% 6 -
Oklahoma 11 11 3 27.3% 8 -
Oregon 19 18 4 22.2% 14 1
Pennsylvania 9 9 2 22.2% 7 -
South Dakota 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Texas 15 11 1 9.1% 10 4
Vermont 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Virginia 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Washington 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
West Virginia 2 2 - - 2 -
Wisconsin 7 7 1 14.3% 6 -