ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Defect reduction
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 39.3%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 293 272 107 39.3% 165 21
Arizona 6 5 2 40.0% 3 1
Arkansas 6 6 - - 6 -
California 49 47 19 40.4% 28 2
Colorado 15 15 8 53.3% 7 -
Florida 35 32 13 40.6% 19 3
Georgia 4 3 1 33.3% 2 1
Idaho 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Illinois 21 21 5 23.8% 16 -
Indiana 1 - - - - 1
Iowa 2 2 - - 2 -
Kansas 8 6 4 66.7% 2 2
Kentucky 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Louisiana 1 1 - - 1 -
Maine 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 1 1 - - 1 -
Michigan 12 12 7 58.3% 5 -
Minnesota 2 2 - - 2 -
Mississippi 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Missouri 6 6 3 50.0% 3 -
Nebraska 1 1 - - 1 -
Nevada 1 1 - - 1 -
New Hampshire 4 3 2 66.7% 1 1
New Jersey 3 2 - - 2 1
New Mexico 2 2 - - 2 -
New York 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
North Carolina 13 12 7 58.3% 5 1
Ohio 14 14 5 35.7% 9 -
Oklahoma 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Oregon 17 16 9 56.3% 7 1
Pennsylvania 8 8 2 25.0% 6 -
South Carolina 2 2 - - 2 -
Tennessee 4 3 2 66.7% 1 1
Texas 9 6 4 66.7% 2 3
Virginia 9 8 4 50.0% 4 1
Washington 5 4 - - 4 1
West Virginia 7 7 - - 7 -
Wisconsin 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Wyoming 1 - - - - 1