ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Eliminate leaks in water lines and valves
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 76.9%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 189 173 133 76.9% 40 16
Alabama 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Alaska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Arizona 10 10 9 90.0% 1 -
Arkansas 2 2 2 100.0% - -
California 11 9 9 100.0% - 2
Colorado 5 5 4 80.0% 1 -
Connecticut 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Delaware 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Florida 5 5 5 100.0% - -
Georgia 15 13 8 61.5% 5 2
Illinois 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Indiana 6 6 3 50.0% 3 -
Iowa 5 5 3 60.0% 2 -
Kansas 3 3 3 100.0% - -
Kentucky 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Louisiana 4 4 4 100.0% - -
Maine 7 6 6 100.0% - 1
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Michigan 2 2 - - 2 -
Minnesota 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Mississippi 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Missouri 5 4 2 50.0% 2 1
Nebraska 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Nevada 4 1 1 100.0% - 3
New Jersey 6 6 5 83.3% 1 -
New Mexico 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New York 1 1 - - 1 -
North Carolina 5 4 3 75.0% 1 1
Ohio 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Oklahoma 3 2 - - 2 1
Oregon 4 4 4 100.0% - -
Pennsylvania 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
South Carolina 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Tennessee 7 6 5 83.3% 1 1
Texas 34 32 31 96.9% 1 2
Utah 3 2 2 100.0% - 1
Virginia 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Washington 1 1 1 100.0% - -
West Virginia 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -