ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Keep doors and windows shut when not on use
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 71.3%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 209 174 124 71.3% 50 35
Alabama 14 13 9 69.2% 4 1
Arizona 1 1 - - 1 -
Arkansas 2 1 - - 1 1
California 11 8 4 50.0% 4 3
Colorado 15 15 13 86.7% 2 -
Connecticut 2 1 1 100.0% - 1
Delaware 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Florida 13 8 7 87.5% 1 5
Georgia 9 7 7 100.0% - 2
Illinois 8 8 5 62.5% 3 -
Indiana 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Iowa 4 3 2 66.7% 1 1
Kansas 8 8 4 50.0% 4 -
Kentucky 11 6 5 83.3% 1 5
Louisiana 8 7 5 71.4% 2 1
Maryland 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Michigan 9 8 6 75.0% 2 1
Minnesota 1 1 - - 1 -
Mississippi 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Missouri 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Nebraska 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Nevada 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Hampshire 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Jersey 5 4 3 75.0% 1 1
New York 7 6 2 33.3% 4 1
North Carolina 3 2 2 100.0% - 1
North Dakota 1 1 - - 1 -
Ohio 15 12 10 83.3% 2 3
Pennsylvania 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
South Carolina 10 5 5 100.0% - 5
Tennessee 4 4 4 100.0% - -
Texas 10 8 7 87.5% 1 2
Utah 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Virginia 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Wisconsin 2 2 - - 2 -