ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Add area lighting switches
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 47.0%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 188 168 79 47.0% 89 20
Alabama 1 1 - - 1 -
Arizona 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Arkansas 2 2 2 100.0% - -
California 18 17 12 70.6% 5 1
Colorado 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Connecticut 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Delaware 3 3 3 100.0% - -
Florida 29 19 7 36.8% 12 10
Georgia 2 1 - - 1 1
Idaho 1 1 - - 1 -
Illinois 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Indiana 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Iowa 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Kansas 1 1 - - 1 -
Kentucky 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Louisiana 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Maryland 1 1 - - 1 -
Massachusetts 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Michigan 7 6 5 83.3% 1 1
Minnesota 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Missouri 2 2 - - 2 -
Nebraska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Jersey 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
New York 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
North Carolina 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
North Dakota 1 1 - - 1 -
Ohio 26 22 5 22.7% 17 4
Oklahoma 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Oregon 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Pennsylvania 6 6 3 50.0% 3 -
South Carolina 1 1 - - 1 -
Tennessee 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Texas 11 9 5 55.6% 4 2
Utah 3 3 3 100.0% - -
Virginia 4 3 - - 3 1
Washington 2 2 2 100.0% - -
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 1 1 - - 1 -