ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Mechanical
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 40.2%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 213 199 80 40.2% 119 14
Alabama 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Alaska 1 1 - - 1 -
Arizona 4 3 - - 3 1
Arkansas 1 1 1 100.0% - -
California 17 17 4 23.5% 13 -
Colorado 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Connecticut 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Florida 11 10 5 50.0% 5 1
Georgia 11 10 4 40.0% 6 1
Hawaii 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Idaho 1 1 - - 1 -
Illinois 3 2 - - 2 1
Indiana 1 1 - - 1 -
Iowa 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Kansas 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Kentucky 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Maine 2 2 - - 2 -
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Michigan 4 4 - - 4 -
Minnesota 1 1 - - 1 -
Missouri 2 2 - - 2 -
Nevada 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Hampshire 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Jersey 2 2 2 100.0% - -
New York 1 1 1 100.0% - -
North Carolina 11 10 4 40.0% 6 1
Ohio 23 21 14 66.7% 7 2
Oklahoma 6 6 - - 6 -
Oregon 30 30 13 43.3% 17 -
Pennsylvania 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
South Carolina 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Tennessee 7 7 1 14.3% 6 -
Texas 13 6 2 33.3% 4 7
Utah 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Vermont 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Virginia 3 3 - - 3 -
Washington 8 8 4 50.0% 4 -
West Virginia 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Wisconsin 3 3 - - 3 -