ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Recharge batteries on during off-peak demand periods
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 52.7%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 537 469 247 52.7% 222 68
Alabama 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Arkansas 4 4 - - 4 -
California 85 68 37 54.4% 31 17
Colorado 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Connecticut 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Delaware 2 2 - - 2 -
Florida 20 17 11 64.7% 6 3
Georgia 20 18 7 38.9% 11 2
Idaho 1 1 - - 1 -
Illinois 119 106 52 49.1% 54 13
Indiana 16 13 7 53.8% 6 3
Iowa 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Kansas 8 8 4 50.0% 4 -
Kentucky 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Michigan 19 16 7 43.8% 9 3
Minnesota 8 5 3 60.0% 2 3
Mississippi 16 16 8 50.0% 8 -
Missouri 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Nebraska 2 1 1 100.0% - 1
Nevada 4 3 3 100.0% - 1
New Hampshire 1 1 - - 1 -
New Jersey 2 2 - - 2 -
New Mexico 1 1 - - 1 -
New York 13 3 3 100.0% - 10
North Carolina 21 18 9 50.0% 9 3
North Dakota 1 - - - - 1
Ohio 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Oklahoma 13 13 6 46.2% 7 -
Oregon 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Pennsylvania 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
South Carolina 5 4 2 50.0% 2 1
South Dakota 2 2 - - 2 -
Tennessee 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Texas 29 27 19 70.4% 8 2
Utah 5 4 - - 4 1
Virginia 7 6 4 66.7% 2 1
West Virginia 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Wisconsin 75 72 41 56.9% 31 3