ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Chill water to the highest temperature possible
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 47.1%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 185 170 80 47.1% 90 15
Alabama 7 6 3 50.0% 3 1
Arizona 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Arkansas 1 1 1 100.0% - -
California 11 11 2 18.2% 9 -
Colorado 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Connecticut 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Delaware 2 1 - - 1 1
Florida 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Georgia 11 10 4 40.0% 6 1
Illinois 4 2 - - 2 2
Indiana 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Kentucky 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Louisiana 10 9 8 88.9% 1 1
Maryland 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Massachusetts 10 10 3 30.0% 7 -
Mississippi 2 2 - - 2 -
Missouri 3 3 3 100.0% - -
Nebraska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Nevada 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Hampshire 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
New Jersey 2 2 2 100.0% - -
New York 1 1 1 100.0% - -
North Carolina 11 10 5 50.0% 5 1
Ohio 34 32 16 50.0% 16 2
Oklahoma 5 4 2 50.0% 2 1
Oregon 1 1 - - 1 -
Pennsylvania 16 15 5 33.3% 10 1
Rhode Island 1 1 - - 1 -
South Carolina 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Tennessee 5 5 3 60.0% 2 -
Texas 6 3 1 33.3% 2 3
Vermont 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Virginia 6 5 3 60.0% 2 1
Washington 2 2 2 100.0% - -
West Virginia 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -