ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Use optimum temperature
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 50.6%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 181 156 79 50.6% 77 25
Alabama 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Alaska 1 - - - - 1
Arkansas 2 2 2 100.0% - -
California 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Colorado 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1
Connecticut 2 2 - - 2 -
Delaware 5 2 - - 2 3
Florida 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1
Georgia 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Illinois 3 3 - - 3 -
Indiana 17 14 8 57.1% 6 3
Iowa 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kansas 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Kentucky 1 1 - - 1 -
Louisiana 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Maine 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Michigan 20 14 8 57.1% 6 6
Mississippi 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Missouri 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Nebraska 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Nevada 1 1 - - 1 -
New Hampshire 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Jersey 7 7 5 71.4% 2 -
North Carolina 3 2 - - 2 1
Ohio 21 18 8 44.4% 10 3
Oklahoma 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Oregon 12 11 6 54.5% 5 1
Pennsylvania 6 4 2 50.0% 2 2
South Carolina 2 1 - - 1 1
Tennessee 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Texas 8 7 4 57.1% 3 1
Utah 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Vermont 1 1 - - 1 -
Virginia 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Washington 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -