ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Use optimum temperature
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 51.8%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 190 170 88 51.8% 82 20
Alabama 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Alaska 1 - - - - 1
Arkansas 2 2 2 100.0% - -
California 6 5 4 80.0% 1 1
Colorado 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1
Connecticut 2 2 - - 2 -
Delaware 8 5 3 60.0% 2 3
Florida 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Georgia 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Illinois 4 3 - - 3 1
Indiana 17 17 9 52.9% 8 -
Iowa 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kansas 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Kentucky 1 1 - - 1 -
Louisiana 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Maine 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Michigan 21 18 11 61.1% 7 3
Mississippi 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Missouri 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Nebraska 3 2 2 100.0% - 1
Nevada 1 1 - - 1 -
New Hampshire 1 1 1 100.0% - -
New Jersey 7 7 5 71.4% 2 -
North Carolina 3 2 - - 2 1
Ohio 21 18 8 44.4% 10 3
Oklahoma 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Oregon 12 11 6 54.5% 5 1
Pennsylvania 6 4 2 50.0% 2 2
South Carolina 2 1 - - 1 1
Tennessee 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Texas 8 8 5 62.5% 3 -
Utah 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Vermont 1 1 - - 1 -
Virginia 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Washington 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -