ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Operation
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 50.2%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 248 227 114 50.2% 113 21
Alabama 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Alaska 1 - - - - 1
Arkansas 3 3 3 100.0% - -
California 7 6 4 66.7% 2 1
Colorado 8 7 4 57.1% 3 1
Connecticut 3 3 - - 3 -
Delaware 8 5 3 60.0% 2 3
Florida 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Georgia 21 20 8 40.0% 12 1
Illinois 4 3 - - 3 1
Indiana 18 18 10 55.6% 8 -
Iowa 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kansas 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Kentucky 1 1 - - 1 -
Louisiana 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Maine 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 16 16 6 37.5% 10 -
Michigan 21 18 11 61.1% 7 3
Mississippi 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Missouri 9 9 6 66.7% 3 -
Nebraska 3 2 2 100.0% - 1
Nevada 1 1 - - 1 -
New Hampshire 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
New Jersey 8 8 5 62.5% 3 -
North Carolina 3 2 - - 2 1
Ohio 28 25 13 52.0% 12 3
Oklahoma 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Oregon 12 11 6 54.5% 5 1
Pennsylvania 6 4 2 50.0% 2 2
Rhode Island 2 2 - - 2 -
South Carolina 2 1 - - 1 1
Tennessee 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1
Texas 10 10 6 60.0% 4 -
Utah 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Vermont 1 1 - - 1 -
Virginia 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Washington 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
West Virginia 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Wisconsin 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -