ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Adjust burners for efficient operation
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 66.4%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 235 217 144 66.4% 73 18
Alabama 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Alaska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Arizona 7 5 3 60.0% 2 2
Arkansas 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
California 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Colorado 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Connecticut 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Florida 4 3 1 33.3% 2 1
Georgia 13 11 7 63.6% 4 2
Idaho 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Illinois 18 17 10 58.8% 7 1
Indiana 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Iowa 8 8 6 75.0% 2 -
Kansas 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Kentucky 2 2 - - 2 -
Louisiana 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Maryland 3 3 3 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Michigan 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Minnesota 5 5 3 60.0% 2 -
Mississippi 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Missouri 2 1 1 100.0% - 1
Nebraska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Nevada 4 4 4 100.0% - -
New Jersey 2 1 - - 1 1
New York 3 3 3 100.0% - -
North Carolina 51 48 38 79.2% 10 3
Ohio 9 8 4 50.0% 4 1
Oklahoma 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Oregon 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Pennsylvania 13 12 5 41.7% 7 1
South Carolina 6 3 2 66.7% 1 3
Tennessee 5 5 4 80.0% 1 -
Texas 5 5 4 80.0% 1 -
Utah 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Virginia 10 9 8 88.9% 1 1
Washington 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
West Virginia 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Wisconsin 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1