ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Reduce combustion air flow to optimum
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 48.6%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 226 208 101 48.6% 107 18
Alabama 26 25 7 28.0% 18 1
Alaska 1 1 - - 1 -
Arkansas 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
California 5 5 4 80.0% 1 -
Colorado 2 1 - - 1 1
Connecticut 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Delaware 1 1 - - 1 -
Florida 6 5 4 80.0% 1 1
Georgia 15 14 5 35.7% 9 1
Idaho 2 - - - - 2
Illinois 10 9 7 77.8% 2 1
Indiana 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Kansas 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kentucky 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Maine 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Maryland 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 8 8 1 12.5% 7 -
Michigan 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Mississippi 2 2 - - 2 -
Missouri 10 9 7 77.8% 2 1
Nebraska 1 1 - - 1 -
Nevada 1 - - - - 1
New Hampshire 4 4 - - 4 -
New Jersey 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
New York 2 2 2 100.0% - -
North Carolina 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Ohio 9 7 6 85.7% 1 2
Oklahoma 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Oregon 24 24 10 41.7% 14 -
Pennsylvania 10 9 8 88.9% 1 1
South Carolina 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Tennessee 9 9 3 33.3% 6 -
Texas 11 8 6 75.0% 2 3
Utah 2 2 - - 2 -
Vermont 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Washington 9 7 4 57.1% 3 2
West Virginia 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Wisconsin 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1