ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS Glass and glass product manufacturing
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 50.8%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 851 760 386 50.8% 374 91
Alabama 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Arkansas 13 13 4 30.8% 9 -
California 91 61 18 29.5% 43 30
Colorado 28 28 17 60.7% 11 -
Florida 57 57 26 45.6% 31 -
Georgia 14 8 5 62.5% 3 6
Illinois 18 7 5 71.4% 2 11
Indiana 28 20 10 50.0% 10 8
Iowa 7 7 5 71.4% 2 -
Kentucky 20 20 5 25.0% 15 -
Louisiana 27 27 14 51.9% 13 -
Maryland 12 12 6 50.0% 6 -
Massachusetts 15 15 8 53.3% 7 -
Michigan 6 - - - - 6
Minnesota 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Mississippi 5 5 4 80.0% 1 -
Missouri 13 13 10 76.9% 3 -
Nebraska 8 8 6 75.0% 2 -
New Jersey 31 31 14 45.2% 17 -
New York 32 32 25 78.1% 7 -
North Carolina 24 21 14 66.7% 7 3
Ohio 40 31 13 41.9% 18 9
Oklahoma 36 28 7 25.0% 21 8
Oregon 8 4 1 25.0% 3 4
Pennsylvania 36 36 16 44.4% 20 -
Puerto Rico 13 13 8 61.5% 5 -
Rhode Island 9 9 9 100.0% - -
South Carolina 8 8 5 62.5% 3 -
Tennessee 31 31 10 32.3% 21 -
Texas 62 62 39 62.9% 23 -
Utah 5 5 4 80.0% 1 -
Virginia 21 21 10 47.6% 11 -
Washington 23 23 9 39.1% 14 -
West Virginia 76 70 44 62.9% 26 6
Wisconsin 18 18 7 38.9% 11 -