ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS Rubber product manufacturing
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 49.3%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 1,520 1,348 664 49.3% 684 172
Alabama 27 27 7 25.9% 20 -
Arizona 7 7 1 14.3% 6 -
Arkansas 40 40 7 17.5% 33 -
California 125 98 29 29.6% 69 27
Colorado 15 9 6 66.7% 3 6
Connecticut 9 9 - - 9 -
Florida 64 64 41 64.1% 23 -
Georgia 52 43 19 44.2% 24 9
Illinois 53 44 22 50.0% 22 9
Indiana 82 70 41 58.6% 29 12
Iowa 13 13 9 69.2% 4 -
Kansas 35 35 6 17.1% 29 -
Kentucky 44 31 16 51.6% 15 13
Louisiana 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -
Maryland 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Massachusetts 11 11 7 63.6% 4 -
Michigan 54 54 26 48.1% 28 -
Minnesota 5 - - - - 5
Mississippi 34 32 11 34.4% 21 2
Missouri 59 59 40 67.8% 19 -
Nebraska 46 46 32 69.6% 14 -
New Hampshire 6 6 6 100.0% - -
New Jersey 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
New York 23 23 14 60.9% 9 -
North Carolina 62 33 17 51.5% 16 29
Ohio 296 262 148 56.5% 114 34
Oklahoma 43 43 21 48.8% 22 -
Pennsylvania 33 33 22 66.7% 11 -
South Carolina 4 - - - - 4
Tennessee 89 89 28 31.5% 61 -
Texas 63 63 41 65.1% 22 -
Utah 23 16 2 12.5% 14 7
Virginia 26 18 13 72.2% 5 8
West Virginia 14 14 10 71.4% 4 -
Wisconsin 42 35 13 37.1% 22 7