ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Replace obsolete burners with more efficient ones
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 27.6%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 243 225 62 27.6% 163 18
Alabama 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Arizona 2 2 - - 2 -
Arkansas 1 1 1 100.0% - -
California 22 21 6 28.6% 15 1
Colorado 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Connecticut 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Delaware 1 1 - - 1 -
Florida 4 4 - - 4 -
Georgia 8 8 2 25.0% 6 -
Hawaii 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Illinois 57 48 11 22.9% 37 9
Indiana 8 8 2 25.0% 6 -
Iowa 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Kansas 2 2 - - 2 -
Kentucky 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Maine 1 1 - - 1 -
Maryland 5 5 - - 5 -
Massachusetts 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Michigan 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Minnesota 2 2 - - 2 -
Mississippi 2 1 - - 1 1
Missouri 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Nebraska 2 2 2 100.0% - -
New Hampshire 1 1 - - 1 -
New Jersey 7 5 3 60.0% 2 2
New York 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
North Carolina 8 6 2 33.3% 4 2
Ohio 22 21 6 28.6% 15 1
Oklahoma 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Oregon 4 4 - - 4 -
Pennsylvania 13 13 3 23.1% 10 -
South Carolina 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Tennessee 2 2 - - 2 -
Texas 1 1 - - 1 -
Virginia 8 6 - - 6 2
Washington 2 2 2 100.0% - -
West Virginia 16 16 1 6.3% 15 -
Wisconsin 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -