ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC Metal cans and shipping containers
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 54.4%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 1,061 1,000 544 54.4% 456 61
Alabama 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Arizona 31 23 16 69.6% 7 8
Arkansas 5 5 5 100.0% - -
California 77 77 45 58.4% 32 -
Colorado 30 30 17 56.7% 13 -
Florida 20 20 12 60.0% 8 -
Georgia 11 11 10 90.9% 1 -
Illinois 90 81 28 34.6% 53 9
Indiana 23 23 13 56.5% 10 -
Iowa 32 32 15 46.9% 17 -
Kansas 32 32 20 62.5% 12 -
Kentucky 11 11 8 72.7% 3 -
Maryland 23 23 12 52.2% 11 -
Massachusetts 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Michigan 3 - - - - 3
Minnesota 15 15 10 66.7% 5 -
Mississippi 7 4 1 25.0% 3 3
Missouri 54 54 28 51.9% 26 -
Montana 10 10 7 70.0% 3 -
Nebraska 17 17 7 41.2% 10 -
New Jersey 35 35 15 42.9% 20 -
New York 13 13 8 61.5% 5 -
North Carolina 8 - - - - 8
Ohio 107 96 55 57.3% 41 11
Oklahoma 21 15 11 73.3% 4 6
Oregon 32 23 11 47.8% 12 9
Pennsylvania 39 39 24 61.5% 15 -
South Carolina 18 14 9 64.3% 5 4
Tennessee 33 33 17 51.5% 16 -
Texas 97 97 56 57.7% 41 -
Virginia 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Washington 13 13 6 46.2% 7 -
West Virginia 78 78 49 62.8% 29 -
Wisconsin 51 51 20 39.2% 31 -
Wyoming 9 9 2 22.2% 7 -