ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
See Complete Announcement
Grant Program - Open Solicitation
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS All other chemical product and preparation manufacturing
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 49.5%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 944 824 408 49.5% 416 120
Alabama 10 4 3 75.0% 1 6
Arizona 20 20 4 20.0% 16 -
Arkansas 9 6 5 83.3% 1 3
California 64 64 34 53.1% 30 -
Colorado 9 9 3 33.3% 6 -
Connecticut 24 24 6 25.0% 18 -
Delaware 10 10 5 50.0% 5 -
Florida 89 89 53 59.6% 36 -
Georgia 39 39 16 41.0% 23 -
Illinois 5 5 3 60.0% 2 -
Indiana 61 61 28 45.9% 33 -
Iowa 17 17 6 35.3% 11 -
Kansas 11 11 6 54.5% 5 -
Kentucky 38 14 7 50.0% 7 24
Louisiana 64 64 33 51.6% 31 -
Massachusetts 8 8 3 37.5% 5 -
Michigan 21 21 13 61.9% 8 -
Minnesota 7 7 - - 7 -
Missouri 18 13 5 38.5% 8 5
Nevada 6 6 5 83.3% 1 -
New Jersey 21 8 4 50.0% 4 13
New York 12 - - - - 12
North Carolina 24 15 10 66.7% 5 9
Ohio 107 99 57 57.6% 42 8
Oklahoma 21 21 10 47.6% 11 -
Oregon 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Pennsylvania 53 53 22 41.5% 31 -
South Carolina 4 - - - - 4
Tennessee 57 57 23 40.4% 34 -
Texas 50 35 21 60.0% 14 15
Utah 29 8 2 25.0% 6 21
Virginia 12 12 6 50.0% 6 -
West Virginia 21 21 13 61.9% 8 -