ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Use flow control valves on equipment to optimize water use
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 50.5%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 117 105 53 50.5% 52 12
Alaska 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Arizona 9 9 5 55.6% 4 -
Arkansas 3 3 3 100.0% - -
California 5 3 - - 3 2
Colorado 5 5 4 80.0% 1 -
Connecticut 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Delaware 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Florida 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Georgia 6 4 1 25.0% 3 2
Hawaii 1 1 - - 1 -
Idaho 1 - - - - 1
Illinois 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Indiana 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Iowa 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Kansas 1 1 - - 1 -
Kentucky 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Louisiana 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Maine 2 2 - - 2 -
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Michigan 5 5 3 60.0% 2 -
Minnesota 5 5 2 40.0% 3 -
Missouri 1 1 - - 1 -
Nebraska 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Nevada 1 - - - - 1
New Jersey 2 2 - - 2 -
New York 1 1 1 100.0% - -
North Carolina 6 5 1 20.0% 4 1
Ohio 14 13 10 76.9% 3 1
Oregon 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
Pennsylvania 1 1 - - 1 -
South Carolina 8 6 2 33.3% 4 2
Tennessee 3 3 3 100.0% - -
Texas 1 1 - - 1 -
Utah 1 1 - - 1 -
Virginia 3 3 - - 3 -
West Virginia 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -