ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Operations
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 47.9%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 224 211 101 47.9% 110 13
Alabama 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Arizona 1 1 - - 1 -
California 14 13 7 53.8% 6 1
Colorado 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Connecticut 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Delaware 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Florida 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Georgia 17 15 4 26.7% 11 2
Idaho 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Illinois 5 4 3 75.0% 1 1
Indiana 6 6 3 50.0% 3 -
Iowa 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
Kansas 10 10 4 40.0% 6 -
Kentucky 11 9 3 33.3% 6 2
Louisiana 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Maine 1 1 - - 1 -
Maryland 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Massachusetts 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Michigan 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Minnesota 1 1 - - 1 -
Mississippi 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Nebraska 3 2 2 100.0% - 1
New Hampshire 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
New Jersey 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
North Carolina 13 11 6 54.5% 5 2
Ohio 17 17 8 47.1% 9 -
Oklahoma 5 4 3 75.0% 1 1
Oregon 16 16 9 56.3% 7 -
Pennsylvania 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
South Carolina 9 7 2 28.6% 5 2
Tennessee 35 35 18 51.4% 17 -
Texas 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Virginia 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Washington 2 2 - - 2 -
West Virginia 4 4 - - 4 -
Wisconsin 1 - - - - 1
Wyoming 1 1 1 100.0% - -