ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC Surgical and medical instruments and apparatus
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 51.7%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 1,102 1,012 523 51.7% 489 90
Alabama 16 11 5 45.5% 6 5
California 132 116 36 31.0% 80 16
Colorado 33 33 20 60.6% 13 -
Connecticut 31 26 9 34.6% 17 5
Delaware 12 12 3 25.0% 9 -
Florida 194 189 114 60.3% 75 5
Georgia 19 19 4 21.1% 15 -
Illinois 10 - - - - 10
Indiana 19 19 18 94.7% 1 -
Iowa 5 - - - - 5
Kansas 7 7 3 42.9% 4 -
Maryland 16 16 10 62.5% 6 -
Massachusetts 53 53 24 45.3% 29 -
Michigan 21 21 7 33.3% 14 -
Minnesota 20 20 12 60.0% 8 -
Mississippi 6 6 2 33.3% 4 -
Missouri 27 27 10 37.0% 17 -
Nebraska 26 12 8 66.7% 4 14
Nevada 12 12 8 66.7% 4 -
New Jersey 41 41 23 56.1% 18 -
New Mexico 7 7 4 57.1% 3 -
New York 66 57 31 54.4% 26 9
North Carolina 28 28 9 32.1% 19 -
Ohio 23 23 11 47.8% 12 -
Oklahoma 32 32 18 56.3% 14 -
Oregon 5 - - - - 5
Pennsylvania 33 33 17 51.5% 16 -
Puerto Rico 60 60 40 66.7% 20 -
South Carolina 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Tennessee 8 8 4 50.0% 4 -
Texas 52 43 28 65.1% 15 9
Utah 50 43 22 51.2% 21 7
Virginia 23 23 16 69.6% 7 -
Wisconsin 11 11 5 45.5% 6 -