ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC 2+ Digits Required
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC Miscellaneous electrical machinery, equipment, and supplies
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 47.7%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 1,052 917 437 47.7% 480 135
Alabama 11 11 4 36.4% 7 -
Arizona 12 12 6 50.0% 6 -
Arkansas 12 12 5 41.7% 7 -
California 69 44 19 43.2% 25 25
Colorado 40 31 17 54.8% 14 9
Connecticut 24 11 6 54.5% 5 13
Florida 57 43 18 41.9% 25 14
Georgia 72 67 24 35.8% 43 5
Illinois 54 45 21 46.7% 24 9
Indiana 62 57 20 35.1% 37 5
Iowa 35 35 22 62.9% 13 -
Kansas 56 56 40 71.4% 16 -
Kentucky 37 18 11 61.1% 7 19
Maine 30 18 8 44.4% 10 12
Mississippi 37 33 16 48.5% 17 4
Missouri 55 55 35 63.6% 20 -
Nebraska 15 15 1 6.7% 14 -
Nevada 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
New Hampshire 9 9 - - 9 -
New Jersey 15 15 8 53.3% 7 -
New York 19 19 13 68.4% 6 -
North Carolina 38 32 20 62.5% 12 6
Ohio 39 33 9 27.3% 24 6
Oklahoma 54 54 30 55.6% 24 -
Oregon 27 27 12 44.4% 15 -
Pennsylvania 28 28 9 32.1% 19 -
Puerto Rico 8 - - - - 8
South Carolina 13 13 6 46.2% 7 -
Tennessee 26 26 6 23.1% 20 -
Texas 32 32 16 50.0% 16 -
Vermont 23 23 12 52.2% 11 -
West Virginia 27 27 17 63.0% 10 -
Wisconsin 7 7 2 28.6% 5 -