ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Other inventory controls
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 44.2%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 285 260 115 44.2% 145 25
Alabama 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Alaska 3 2 1 50.0% 1 1
Arizona 9 8 4 50.0% 4 1
Arkansas 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
California 39 38 20 52.6% 18 1
Colorado 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Connecticut 1 - - - - 1
Florida 28 23 8 34.8% 15 5
Idaho 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
Illinois 28 26 9 34.6% 17 2
Indiana 7 7 7 100.0% - -
Iowa 19 18 3 16.7% 15 1
Kentucky 9 8 4 50.0% 4 1
Louisiana 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Maine 1 1 - - 1 -
Maryland 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 1 1 - - 1 -
Michigan 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Minnesota 6 6 1 16.7% 5 -
Mississippi 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Missouri 2 2 - - 2 -
Nebraska 1 1 - - 1 -
Nevada 7 6 5 83.3% 1 1
New Jersey 1 1 - - 1 -
New York 8 8 2 25.0% 6 -
North Carolina 15 15 6 40.0% 9 -
Ohio 9 9 4 44.4% 5 -
Oklahoma 8 6 2 33.3% 4 2
Oregon 12 11 7 63.6% 4 1
Pennsylvania 9 7 2 28.6% 5 2
South Carolina 3 3 1 33.3% 2 -
South Dakota 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Tennessee 11 9 5 55.6% 4 2
Texas 8 6 2 33.3% 4 2
Virginia 8 7 5 71.4% 2 1
West Virginia 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Wisconsin 6 5 - - 5 1
Wyoming 1 1 - - 1 -