ITAC Assessment: UF0435
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UF0435
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2010
Principal Product Military Aircraft
NAICS 336411: Aircraft Manufacturing
SIC 3721: Aircraft
Sales Range $50
M
to 100
M
# of Employees 400
Plant Area 341,476
ft2
Annual Production 10
units
Production Hrs. Annual 8,760
hrs
Location (State) Florida

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $421,821 6,281,600
kWh
Electricity Demand $130,608 21,860
kW-mo/yr
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $109,591 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $41,808

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings
01 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $60,031 $5,388 $60,031
887,237
kWh
-
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $38,247 $18,650 $31,221
355,631
kWh
$7,026
-
kW-mo/yr
03 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $2,927 $9,651 $2,590
38,029
kWh
$337
-
kW-mo/yr
04 2.6221: Use most efficient equipment at it's maximum capacity and less efficient equipment only when necessary $634 $20 $634
9,320
kWh
-
05 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $7,752 $772 $7,752
114,005
kWh
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $109,591 $34,481 $102,228
1,404,222
kWh
$7,363
-
kW-mo/yr
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $41,808 $28,321 $34,445
402,980
kWh
$7,363
-
kW-mo/yr
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs