ITAC Assessment: SD0005
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: SD0005
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1991
Principal Product MEDICAL SUPPLIES
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3842: Orthopedic, Prosthetic, and Surgical Appliances and Supplies
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 149
Plant Area
n/a
Annual Production 10,598
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,250
hrs
Location (State) California

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $169,191 1,953,986
kWh
Natural Gas $32,680 5,053
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $14,131 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $14,131

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Administrative Changes Savings
01 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $147 $315 $147
1,758
kWh
-
02 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $467 $435 $467
5,275
kWh
-
03 2.7123: Keep lamps and reflectors clean $3,477 - $3,160
26,964
kWh
$317
04 2.7123: Keep lamps and reflectors clean $821 - $749
8,499
kWh
$72
05 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $5,746 $600 $5,746
66,530
kWh
-
06 2.6232: Install set-back timers $3,473 $6,900 $3,473
36,049
kWh
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $14,131 $8,250 $13,742
145,075
kWh
$389
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $14,131 $8,250 $13,742
145,075
kWh
$389
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Administrative Changes Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs