ITAC Assessment: AS0223
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: AS0223
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 1998
Principal Product Thermoformed Plastic Packaging
NAICS
n/a
SIC 3089: Plastics Products, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 80
Plant Area 84,000
ft2
Annual Production 5,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 4,284
hrs
Location (State) Arizona

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $152,235 2,156,506
kWh
Electricity Demand $11,336 6,426
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $11,195 -
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $497,090 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $491,595

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Increase in Production Savings
01 2.7135: Install occupancy sensors $627 $1,275 $417
8,499
kWh
$210
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
02 2.7111: Reduce illumination to minimum necessary levels $1,455 $2,300 $1,455
29,894
kWh
- - - -
03 2.7122: Disconnect ballasts $163 $15 $137
2,931
kWh
$26
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
04 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $113 $406 $95
2,052
kWh
$18
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
05 2.4133: Use most efficient type of electric motors $453 $755 $303
6,448
kWh
$150
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
06 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,184 $540 $999
20,516
kWh
$185
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
07 3.6192: Use a less expensive method of waste removal $4,500 $60 - - $4,500 - -
08 4.231: Purchase equipment instead of leasing $3,300 $10,198 - - $3,300 - -
09 4.652: Replace existing equipment with more suitable substitutes $485,295 $705,960 - - - $(-397,059.0) $882,354
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $497,090 $721,509 $3,406
70,340
kWh
$589
-
kW-mo/yr
$7,800 $(-397,059.0) $882,354
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $491,595 $707,330 $1,439
29,895
kWh
$361
-
kW-mo/yr
$4,500 $(-397,059.0) $882,354
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Administrative Changes Savings Primary Raw Material Savings Increase in Production Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs