ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Avoid introducing hot, humid, or dirty air into hvac system
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 46.0%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 187 174 80 46.0% 94 13
Alabama 4 4 3 75.0% 1 -
Arizona 9 9 5 55.6% 4 -
Arkansas 2 2 1 50.0% 1 -
California 9 7 3 42.9% 4 2
Colorado 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Connecticut 2 2 - - 2 -
Delaware 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
Florida 8 7 3 42.9% 4 1
Georgia 11 11 5 45.5% 6 -
Idaho 1 1 - - 1 -
Illinois 4 3 1 33.3% 2 1
Indiana 2 2 - - 2 -
Iowa 3 3 - - 3 -
Kansas 8 8 1 12.5% 7 -
Kentucky 7 3 2 66.7% 1 4
Louisiana 2 - - - - 2
Maine 1 1 1 100.0% - -
Maryland 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Massachusetts 2 2 2 100.0% - -
Michigan 1 1 - - 1 -
Minnesota 2 2 - - 2 -
Mississippi 12 11 6 54.5% 5 1
Missouri 3 3 2 66.7% 1 -
Nebraska 2 2 - - 2 -
New Hampshire 1 1 - - 1 -
New Jersey 2 2 2 100.0% - -
North Carolina 35 34 15 44.1% 19 1
Ohio 7 7 5 71.4% 2 -
Oklahoma 6 6 4 66.7% 2 -
Puerto Rico 1 - - - - 1
South Carolina 5 5 - - 5 -
Tennessee 6 6 3 50.0% 3 -
Texas 13 13 9 69.2% 4 -
Utah 1 1 - - 1 -
Virginia 4 4 2 50.0% 2 -
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 3 3 - - 3 -