ITAC Implementation Rates
ITAC logo
ITAC Implementation Rates
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
$
$
ARC Use a fossil fuel engine to cogenerate electricity or motive power; and utilize heat
NAICS 3+ Digits Required
SIC 2+ Digits Required
3+ Characters Required for Products
Average Implementation Rate for All Matching Recommendations: 13.0%
>
State
Total Rec's
Imp Status Known
Imp'd
Imp Rate
Not Imp'd
Imp Status Unknown
ALL 286 262 34 13.0% 228 24
Alabama 2 2 - - 2 -
Alaska 3 3 - - 3 -
Arizona 24 24 4 16.7% 20 -
Arkansas 1 1 - - 1 -
California 56 55 11 20.0% 44 1
Colorado 3 2 - - 2 1
Connecticut 5 5 1 20.0% 4 -
Delaware 1 1 - - 1 -
Florida 13 13 4 30.8% 9 -
Georgia 10 8 1 12.5% 7 2
Idaho 3 - - - - 3
Illinois 14 11 1 9.1% 10 3
Indiana 11 11 - - 11 -
Kansas 1 1 - - 1 -
Kentucky 6 5 1 20.0% 4 1
Maine 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
Massachusetts 10 9 1 11.1% 8 1
Michigan 5 4 - - 4 1
Minnesota 3 2 - - 2 1
Mississippi 5 3 - - 3 2
Missouri 4 4 - - 4 -
Nebraska 1 1 - - 1 -
Nevada 4 4 1 25.0% 3 -
New Hampshire 7 6 - - 6 1
New Jersey 7 6 - - 6 1
New Mexico 1 1 - - 1 -
New York 16 16 3 18.8% 13 -
North Carolina 9 7 1 14.3% 6 2
Ohio 7 7 - - 7 -
Oklahoma 2 2 - - 2 -
Oregon 2 2 - - 2 -
Pennsylvania 14 12 2 16.7% 10 2
Puerto Rico 5 4 1 25.0% 3 1
Rhode Island 2 2 - - 2 -
Tennessee 4 4 - - 4 -
Texas 8 7 1 14.3% 6 1
Utah 1 1 - - 1 -
Vermont 1 1 - - 1 -
West Virginia 1 1 - - 1 -
Wisconsin 10 10 - - 10 -