ITAC Assessment: WV0326
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: WV0326
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2005
Principal Product Metal Plated Products
NAICS 332812: Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers
SIC 3479: Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $1
M
to 5
M
# of Employees 52
Plant Area 69,500
ft2
Annual Production 18,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,860
hrs
Location (State) Ohio
View Case Study

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $54,721 1,550,797
kWh
Electricity Demand $69,284 6,315
kW-mo/yr
Electricity Fees $2,407 -
Natural Gas $178,841 25,088
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $28,931 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $22,875

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
01 2.2511: Insulate bare equipment $6,011 $1,797 - - $6,011
-
MMBtu
- -
02 2.7142: Utilize higher efficiency lamps and/or ballasts $5,897 $14,339 $2,533
71,818
kWh
$3,364
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
03 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $5,386 $1,840 $2,336
66,085
kWh
$3,050
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
04 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $4,621 $2,722 - - $4,621
-
MMBtu
- -
05 2.1233: Analyze flue gas for proper air/fuel ratio $2,818 $1,000 - - $2,852
-
MMBtu
$(-34.0) -
06 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $1,047 $3,517 $455
12,876
kWh
$592
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
07 2.2426: Use waste heat from flue gases to heat space conditioning air $780 $1,076 $(-73.0)
(-2,051)
kWh
$(-186.0)
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,039
-
MMBtu
- -
08 2.2628: Utilize a less expensive cooling method $652 $367 $279
8,045
kWh
$373
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
09 2.4314: Use synthetic lubricant $577 $17 $248
7,032
kWh
$329
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
10 2.4151: Develop a repair/replace policy $459 $54 $290
8,204
kWh
$373
-
kW-mo/yr
- $(-204.0) -
11 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $388 $140 $300
8,572
kWh
$88
-
kW-mo/yr
- - -
12 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $295 $180 $186
5,334
kWh
$241
-
kW-mo/yr
- $(-102.0) $(-30.0)
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $28,931 $27,049 $6,554
185,915
kWh
$8,224
-
kW-mo/yr
$14,523
-
MMBtu
$(-340.0) $(-30.0)
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $22,875 $20,670 $5,799
164,467
kWh
$7,544
-
kW-mo/yr
$9,902
-
MMBtu
$(-340.0) $(-30.0)
Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings Personnel Changes Savings Ancillary Material Cost Savings
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs