ITAC Assessment: UU0090
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UU0090
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2005
Principal Product clothing
NAICS 315220: Men’s and Boys’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing
SIC 2341: Women's, Misses', Children's, and Infants' Underwear and Nightwear
Sales Range $5
M
to 10
M
# of Employees 110
Plant Area 70,000
ft2
Annual Production 10,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 2,800
hrs
Location (State) Utah

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $56,069 790,400
kWh
Natural Gas $15,104 1,976
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $19,600 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $11,500

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Electricity Demand Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.7229: Air condition only space necessary $11,500 $225 $6,310
214,700
kWh
$3,270
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,920
-
MMBtu
02 2.4236: Eliminate leaks in inert gas and compressed air lines/ valves $2,520 $4,570 $900
30,700
kWh
$1,620
-
kW-mo/yr
-
03 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $4,540 $5,920 - - $4,540
-
MMBtu
04 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,040 $500 $470
16,100
kWh
$570
-
kW-mo/yr
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $19,600 $11,215 $7,680
261,500
kWh
$5,460
-
kW-mo/yr
$6,460
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $11,500 $225 $6,310
214,700
kWh
$3,270
-
kW-mo/yr
$1,920
-
MMBtu
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs