ITAC Assessment: UM0456
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UM0456
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2015
Principal Product Metal products
NAICS 332812: Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers
SIC 3499: Fabricated Metal Products, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 150
Plant Area 66,400
ft2
Annual Production 20,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 5,824
hrs
Location (State) Michigan

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $372,874 3,340,506
kWh
Natural Gas $97,507 12,869
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $46,835 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $45,537

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,025 $1,500 $1,025
9,196
kWh
-
02 2.1311: Replace electrically-operated equipment with fossil fuel equipment $21,808 $17,500 $31,170
279,552
kWh
$(-9,362.0)
-
MMBtu
03 2.2711: Utilize outside air instead of conditioned air for drying $1,298 $100 $1,298
11,648
kWh
-
04 2.2414: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to preheat $22,704 $10,000 - $22,704
-
MMBtu
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $46,835 $29,100 $33,493
300,396
kWh
$13,342
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $45,537 $29,000 $32,195
288,748
kWh
$13,342
-
MMBtu
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs