ITAC Assessment: UM0454
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UM0454
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2015
Principal Product coated can end stock, metal
NAICS 331318: Other Aluminum Rolling, Drawing, and Extruding
SIC 3355: Aluminum Rolling and Drawing, Not Elsewhere Classified
Sales Range $100
M
to 500
M
# of Employees 90
Plant Area 150,000
ft2
Annual Production 150,000,000
lb
Production Hrs. Annual 7,488
hrs
Location (State) Ohio

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $533,789 9,406,700
kWh
Natural Gas $947,744 187,058
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $22,695 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $2,130

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings
01 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,028 $2,000 $1,028
18,044
kWh
-
02 2.4146: Use adjustable frequency drive or multiple speed motors on existing system $4,291 $14,700 $4,291
75,276
kWh
-
03 2.7242: Change zone reheat coils to variable air volume boxes $2,130 $1,710 $2,130
37,384
kWh
-
04 2.2422: Use waste heat from hot flue gases to generate steam $13,892 $4,500 - $13,892
-
MMBtu
05 2.2437: Recover waste heat from equipment $1,354 $1,000 - $1,354
-
MMBtu
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $22,695 $23,910 $7,449
130,704
kWh
$15,246
-
MMBtu
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $2,130 $1,710 $2,130
37,384
kWh
-
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs