ITAC Assessment: UM0424
ITAC logo
ITAC Assessment: UM0424
Grant Funding Opportunity NOW OPEN
Up to $300k at 50% cost share for qualifying* projects.
Grant Funding Opportunity Open
Qualifying* small and medium-sized US manufacturers, that received an ITAC, Onsite Energy/CHP TAP, or qualified equivalent assessment since 2018 can now apply for grants for implementation of assessment recommendations at up to 50% of qualifying* project costs with a maximum of $300,000 per grant.
IMPORTANT: The grant program now operates on a rolling basis and applications may be submitted at any time through the year, with quarterly reviews.
*See Full Grant Solicitation for full qualification and selection details.
Assessment Year 2013
Principal Product high precision automotive stamping
NAICS 336370: Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping
SIC 3465: Automotive Stampings
Sales Range $10
M
to 50
M
# of Employees 50
Plant Area 82,000
ft2
Annual Production 100,000,000
pieces
Production Hrs. Annual 6,240
hrs
Location (State) Michigan

Facility Energy Cost and Usage

Source Yearly Cost Usage
Electricity Usage $127,713 1,157,000
kWh
Natural Gas $18,000 2,165
MMBtu
TOTAL YEARLY COSTS -
RECOMMENDED SAVINGS* $55,496 *Non-energy impacts included in savings.
IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS* $10,211

Recommendations

# Description Yearly Savings* Imp'd Cost* Status Electricity Usage Savings Natural Gas Savings Primary Raw Material Savings
01 2.4221: Install compressor air intakes in coolest locations $1,312 $750 $1,312
11,925
kWh
- -
02 2.4231: Reduce the pressure of compressed air to the minimum required $5,204 $1,000 $5,204
47,309
kWh
- -
03 2.4239: Eliminate or reduce compressed air usage $1,141 $600 $1,141
10,374
kWh
- -
04 3.1121: Use more efficient adhesive applicators $44,144 $40,000 $259
2,353
kWh
- $43,885
05 2.7243: Improve air circulation with destratification fans / other methods $3,695 $1,600 - $3,695
-
MMBtu
-
TOTAL RECOMMENDED $55,496 $43,950 $7,916
71,961
kWh
$3,695
-
MMBtu
$43,885
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED $10,211 $3,350 $6,516
59,234
kWh
$3,695
-
MMBtu
-
*Savings and costs are best estimates based on the center's site visit, associated engineering analysis, and typical capital and labor costs